
The Shack, by William P. Young, truly is one of the most fascinating books I have read in a while. I found the story riveting, I couldn’t put it down, and I didn’t want it to end. If you start The Shack, give yourself enough time in the day to read all the way through.
Mackenzie Allen Philips’ youngest daughter, Missy, has been abducted during a family vacation and evidence that she may have been brutally murdered is found in an abandoned shack deep in the Oregon wilderness. Four years later in the midst of his Great Sadness, Mack recieves a suspicious note, apparently from God, inviting him back to that shack for a weekend.
Against his better judgement he arrives at the shack on a wintry afternoon and walks back into his darkest nightmare. What he finds there will change Mack’s world forever.
The story, as many have said provokes within the reader a plethora of emotion, I laughed, I was angry, I was confused and at several points brought to the brink of tears. The premise of the story surrounds a man who has lost his six year old daughter through abduction and brutal murder, and anyone with a daughter will have some difficulty reading this book. The parallels between Mack and my life were to eerily similar for me to rest well after reading it. The scene of tragedy takes place near the Columbia River, I fish on the Columbia River, Mack’s wife’s name is Nanette, my wife’s name is Danette, his daughter’s name is Missy and my five year old girl is named Macie. I know it is a stretch, but it was hard for me not to connect the dots.
Even though I enjoyed The Shack, this is not a book that I would recommend to everyone as it is a work of fiction wrought with a combination of Biblical truths and questionable theological statements. The problem with this work is that it is wonderfully written and engaging as I have said, but if taken as Gospel in the hands of a non-critcal thinker The Shack could have devestating results as the readers view of God could be streched beyond reality. As with many works there are great truths to be found in the book, it will stretch your mind and beg you to go further as you seek for the incombrhensible God, yet the fact that it is fiction must stay at the forefront. Since this review will be too long and most won’t make it to the end, I will point out the areas of caution in the book.
What makes the book so interesting is Young’s view of God. At first offensive as he portrays the Almighty as a large African American women called Papa, but then strangely endearing as the trinity comes forward and each of the three are introduced in their person of the Godhead. I do not mean to suggest that we embrace God as an African American woman, but “God’s” explanation does fit well with our understanding of God, and would become dangerous if this were to be taken as the only view of God in a sort of feminist agenda. Papa (God refers to Himself as Papa, which is very strange coming from a woman) says, “Mackenzie, I am neither male nor female, though both genders are derived from my nature. If I chose to appear to you as a man or a woman it is because I love you.” Though nowhere in Scripture does God reveal Himself as mother, or at all feminine, Young seems to be delving into the mystery as to how both genders are created in His image and His likeness. Since Young isn’t trying to re-write Orthodoxy, it is interesting to follow this train of thought in the mystery of the nature of God, but worth cautioning readers that this is not meant to say that God is only female either, nor should we start praying “Our mother who art in Heaven”.
Another point of caution would come as Papa insists that He did not forsake, or leave Jesus on the Cross. When Jesus painful statement is recited to Papa, “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” The Papa figure in the book says, “You misunderstood the mystery there, regardless of what He felt at that moment, I never left Him.” This to me is a misuse of Scripture and a misunderstanding of the terrible pain Christ endured on the Cross. It seems unlikely to me that Jesus was mistaken when He cried out these words, or that in the pain He was enduring He misread what was really happening. It is difficult to reconcile this idea with Christ being made sin who knew no sin (2 Cor. 5:21). If God never left Him, as Jesus said He did, then this becoming sin thing brings on a number of different questions. I know that thinking about the hypostatic union, and the trinity and such is tricky, but this interpretation, or rather lack of one is a difficult pill to swallow.
Young’s view of God through much of Mack’s experience seems a bit airy fairy, and if not thought through critically certainly can come off with a New Age flair. It is a bit hippyish, with its circle of relationship, colorful aura experience, and some of the language involving God’s submission to us. Left in the wrong hands with poor thinking this could be very dangerous.
If he means that God’s submission to us is in the sense that when we choose to live apart from God, choose to sin, God allows this to happen, if that is his understanding of submission, I would agree, God doesn’t impose Himself on us, but if he means God is bending to our will in an act of submission I would whole heartedly disagree and frankly wouldn’t want to follow a God who wasn’t soveriegn, but bendable. Young’s wording here is a bit vague, and therefore should be read with caution.
Again it can’t be stressed enough that this is fiction, this is not an accurate picture of God, it is not a complete picture of God, it is simply one man’s imagination alongside his worldview and view of Scripture and theology. J.I. Packer in Knowing God gives us this timely reminder, “Through this revelation, which is made available to us in Holy Scripture, we may form a true notion of God; without it we never can. Thus it appears that the positive force of the second commandment is that it compels us to take our thought of God from his own holy Word, and from no other source whatsoever.”
Now considering that it is written as fiction, there are a good many helpful points in The Shack as well. First as I went with Mack through the weekend with God, I was challenged by my own need for intimacy with the Almighty. There were many times during Mack’s talks with Jesus that I could feel myself totally relating to Mack as he asked questions, dealt with pain, healed from hurts and learned to enjoy the presence of God. I left the book desiring God, wanting to know Him, walk with Him talk with Him, experience Him in a real way. The Shack has taken me into a deeper longing to know the true God whom I serve, realizing that all of the walking, talking, experiencing is available to me in Jesus Christ through His Spirit.
Young’s insights also streched my view of God and my thinking of God which I really appreciated. Though I didn’t agree with everything put my way, I was forced to think of God outside of the box I seem content to put Him in. Even in regards to God revealing Himself as a woman, I thought so often we speak of God as being enough for the Fatherless, but we rarely if ever think of Him as being sufficient for someone who needs a mom. I believe God is sufficient for the Fatherless and the Motherless and all humanity so I was glad to think of God in this way. The stretching lead to growing and for that I am grateful.
The Shack changed me, it forced me to think, it challenged me to seek God the true God, it lead me back to the Scriptures the source of authority. It is a work of fiction and that can never be forgotten, but with the Holy Bible in one hand and William P. Youngs work in the other you will be in for a truly great experience as you read The Shack.